The Presbyterian Mission Agency Board on April 15 received the report from a lawyer hired to investigate ethics violations involving the 1001 New Worshipping Communities program.
After hours of closed-door discussion, the board adjourned around 9:30 p.m. April 15 – finishing for the night without making any announcements. The board later announced a changed meeting schedule for Thursday morning (April 16) — saying it would continue to meet in closed session until 10:30 a.m., postponing committee meetings. That schedule may continue to shift as things proceed.
The 1001 controversy exploded last fall after an internal investigation revealed that four employees were involved with an unauthorized plan in which funds were channeled from the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) to an outside corporation they had set up in California. The four were involved with the PC(USA)’s evangelistic efforts to start 1,001 new worshipping communities over 10 years, starting in 2012.
Last fall, the board’s executive committee hired a lawyer from Charlotte, Mark Calloway of the firm Alston and Bird, to conduct an investigation into what happened. Calloway reported his findings to the executive committee in closed-door conference calls April 8 and 10 and to the full board April 15. (The board originally hired a lawyer from Nashville, but switched to Calloway when concerns were raised about a possible conflict of interest involving a board member and that lawyer’s firm.)
An investigation by the board’s audit committee – announced in the minutes of an August 2014 meeting – found that:
- On Dec. 3, 2013, PC(USA) employees set up an independent corporation in California, without authorization from the Presbyterian Mission Agency and using the name Presbyterian Centers for New Church Development Inc. That name is almost identical to the name the PC(USA) uses for its regional centers for evangelistic work.
- A $100,000 grant was made to the California corporation outside of the normal review process of the Mission Development Resources Committee.
- A second grant was initiated but not completed. Linda Valentine, executive director of the Presbyterian Mission Agency, has said all the money was repaid.
The audit committee determined that the four employees had violated the PC(USA)’s ethics policy.
Valentine said in a Nov. 12 statement that all the funds were returned and that while “mistakes were made,” the employees’ actions “were not for personal gain.” The employee who formed the corporation applied to the Internal Revenue Service for nonprofit status for the corporation, she has said. Valentine also said in the statement that while some had called for the four employees to be terminated, she had decided not to do that, although “strong new measures have been put in place to ensure this does not happen again.”
On Nov. 15, 2014, four employees involved with the program were put on paid administrative leave, at the executive committee’s request, while Calloway’s investigation was underway. Those employees are:
- Roger Dermody, the PC(USA)’s deputy executive director for mission (one of two deputy directors who serve directly under Valentine);
- Eric Hoey, director of Evangelism and Church Growth;
- Philip Lotspeich, then-coordinator for church growth, with responsibility for overseeing the 1001 initiative; and
- Craig S. Williams, who is based in California and who staffs the western regional office of the Presbyterian Centers for New Church Development.
During its closed-door conference call meeting on April 10, the executive committee voted to instruct Barry Creech, director for policy, administration and board support, to “identify and remove from the public domain” documents related to the investigation, with the action to be taken by April 15, and “to create a list of those documents for inclusion in these minutes” of the April 10 meeting. The documents to be removed from the PC(USA) website include minutes of board and committee meetings and Presbyterian News Service articles related to the controversy.
Whenever an organization engages in close door meetings, removing documents from public access, or takes steps to either chill, inhibit, or deny stake-holders and supporters right to know, or have oversight, nothing good will happen, and the institution is in essence in damage-control mode. Those who prefer the darkness to operate, will only ask and require more darkness to accomplish their tasks.
Another sign of an out of touch, bloated, inefficient and corrupt organization not worthy of trust or confidence.
So let me see if I get this right. Some employees misspend $100,000 that is quickly repaid when the error is discovered. To fully investigate what happened, four employees are put on paid leave for five months. Let’s say they make, with benefits, around $100,000/year. That’s roughly $166,000 paid for nothing. Add to that something like $20-30,000 (or perhaps more) to hire a lawyer to figure out what happened.
So, the PCUSA has, so far, spent about $200,000 to figure out what happened to $100,000 that was quickly returned. I think you’re looking at the wrong money problem.