The expressed desire of some New Wineskins participants to leave the denomination is as old as the church itself. Case in point: the 1920's.
A word that crops up frequently in the discussions around the Missional Church is the word liminal, or liminality. Liminality has to do with that disorienting whitewater experience between the known past and the yet-to-be and unknown future for which there are no patterns. That's where we are, that's what we are experiencing in the North American church at present -- and it can be a bit disorienting. Yet, we shouldn't really be all that surprised. We've been getting the prophetic warnings now for decades. But for (what I consider) a remarkable emerging generation of younger adults, it has provoked a creative quest having to do with the essence of the church.
Editor's Note: The following essay is the sixth in a series dealing with topics of interest and importance to Presbyterians. Author Johnson explains: "The report from the General Assembly Task Force on Peace, Unity, and Purity of the Church provides us both the occasion and the urgency for theological dialogue within the PC(USA). This and succeeding essays are offered as a constructive effort in that direction."
The marks of the true Church become important when (a) the Christian community is deeply divided over issues of its peace, purity, and unity; (b) some members and congregations talk openly about separating from the denomination; and (c) the Church or denomination is reconfiguring its polity, The Book of Order. All of these dynamics are now in play for the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.).
It would be pleasant to the ears to hear a lot less talk about leaving the PC(USA) than we have heard since last July! Enough already! Nearly everything I read about leaving concentrates on gatherings and meetings and votes and why other people are wrong and "we" are right. I have yet to read anything that establishes a scriptural basis for leaving any denomination.
Ben Casey. Dr. Kildare. M*A*S*H. ER. St. Elsewhere. Scrubs. Grey's Anatomy. House. Which was or is your favorite medical show?
Right now, I like House. Yes, it's crude and crass. Emmy winner Hugh Laurie plays the part of a pain-killer-addicted, rude-bedside-mannered surgeon who says things out loud that no human should ever think. But I like the plot lines, even if they are predictable. A patient presenting strange symptoms gets run through a battery of tests and experimental treatments until, finally, a diagnosis is established, treatment gets administered, and she or he recovers.
The New Wineskins Association of Churches (NWAC) has published their strategy document for encouraging congregations to seek dismissal from the PC(USA)[1], including a sample "Open Letter from the Session to the Congregation." The letter makes several claims regarding theology, biblical studies, and the polity of the PC(U.S.A.) that, as I read them, seem deeply problematic and inaccurate.
Lent 3 ¢ Introduction
Jesus saying here about throwing the children's bread to the dogs has troubled readers over the centuries. Did our Lord really share the prejudices of his place and time, prejudices against foreigners, and against women? In my meditation I have tried to imagine how this all might have taken place, and how that amazing Syro-Phoenician woman could have had the sagacity and wit to come up with her winning response. Do read the Scripture passages first and note how Mark's version, although the earlier of the two, comes across more simply and intimately. Perhaps the secret lies in the tiny details that Mark includes, speaking of the woman's little daughter and adding that when she went home she found her cured little girl lying in bed, and the demon gone.
ATLANTA - Nanette Sawyer's congregation doesn't meet in a church.
"This ministry was the dream of the presbytery of Chicago," she said recently. The vision was to minister to people outside the church in an art-filled neighborhood in west Chicago, "people who would not come to church in any traditional kind of setting."
As the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) continues to deal with its various struggles around its spiritual and physical health, a myriad of new terms are tossed about. No debate has been so paradoxically embraced and maligned as the seemingly ambiguous discourse around the "Postmodern" church. Often used alongside such terms as "Emergent," "Culturally Creative," "Bobo" and who knows how many others, this struggle with the church yields the usual debates around what is the Truth (Gospel, God, Church, etc.) and how a people of faith are supposed to faithfully claim and live out that Truth as we understand it.
Isn't it heartening to hear evangelical leaders, who represent some of the core constituents of the White House, speaking prophetically regarding environmental issues? They have spurred hope that significant policy changes could help turn the tide on environmental exploitation.
Presbyterians of deep memory know that these developments have been a long time in coming.
Lent 2 ¢ Introduction
Most of us today will find it difficult to identify with this demoniac, called Legion. He is surely one of the strangest characters in the gospel narratives. And his tale is told in surprising detail and at unusual length. Many of the man's symptoms seem to fit well with modern day accounts, but the ancient concept of demon possession is quite alien to our modern understanding of mental illness. And the whole business with the pigs, while strangely fascinating, is also quite bizarre. Yet I invite you, for a brief moment, to suspend your twenty-first century frame of mind and step back two thousand years to capture something of what this experience must have meant to one so desperately troubled, and in such crying need of deliverance.
We live in a time of great transition from a global economy based on non-renewable resources with their consequences of environmental devastation to some form of sustainable new order. This dilemma is forcing us to radically rethink all our ideologies, be they economic or theological.
Within such a context, President George W. Bush's recent State of the Union address to Congress falls behind the curve. It lacks any desperately needed correction and innovation and shows little awareness of humankind's largest challenge to be stewards of the Creation. We are "staying the course" on this titanic, indestructible ship of state, moving around the deck chairs as we bear directly toward glaciers in the night.
Throughout the nation, Presbyterians of all stripes are responding to God's call to restore and protect creation. The shape of the response varies greatly depending on the particular theological understandings and interests of the people in the congregation, as well as the local environmental challenges of the geographic area.
All his friends would have understood if he had left her. She was unfaithful, wandering, adulterous--plain and simple, she was a whore. The children, who all bore his name, didn't all look very much like him. He was always having to go after her, always having to hunt her down in bars and strip joints and other men's houses. He was always having to bail her out of some mess or another--and, that wasn't cheap or easy. So, everyone would have understood if he had left her. Some would have even applauded. Some would have said, "Well, it's about time! She's been playing him for a fool for way too long!"
Ash Wednesday ain't what it used to be.
In my hometown, Ash Wednesday was an annual coming out party for the Catholics. On that one day each year, everybody knew who they--myself included--were.
The ash smudges on foreheads seemed a perfect metaphor for all things Catholic. Translation: Ash Wednesday proved for all to see that Catholics do guilt well.
Guilt drove my Catholic self to church. What the priests implied, the nuns made explicit: salvation hinges upon doing good, or alternatively, for expending painstaking effort to demonstrate remorse for "any act of rebellion against a known law."
c. 2007 Religion News Service
(RNS) It's easy to characterize religion as a bloodthirsty enterprise. History seems to be strewn with the wreckage of witch hunts, crusades and religious jihad. If God does exist, a caller to my Southern California radio show offered, he ought to be tried for crimes against humanity.
"New atheists" such as "Letter to a Christian Nation" author Sam Harris and "The God Delusion" author Richard Dawkins seem to blame religion -- particularly Christianity -- for all the world's ills. But nothing could be further from the truth.
Lent is for listening.
A season of hushed voices and uncomfortable silences;
of hearing and overhearing ~
hearing the creak and groan of the church building;
overhearing the muffled cough, the stifled sigh ~
in worship, the silenced infant's cry.
Outside the oblivious, uncooperative, noisy world goes on,
white noise distracting.
Lent offers the church a time each year to consider the wondrous love of Jesus Christ and what it means to follow in his way. These resources (some specifically for Lent, others not) may prove useful for individuals and groups who read, pray, plan worship, and study during this season.
The Beatitudes for Today, by James C. Howell. WJKP, 2006. ISBN 0-664-22932-8. Pb., 124 pp. $14.95.
In 14 chapters, Howell reflects on what it means to be blessed in the way of Jesus Christ. His work considers not only what Jesus says, but also what he does not say, ever with an eye to the shape of God's blessing in real human lives. Includes discussion questions at the end of each chapter.
(Matthew 13:1-23. Mark 4:1-20, Luke 8:4-15)
I never actually heard him speak that day,
although, over the next few months,
I listened to him many times.
It was the early springtime - don't you see? -
and I had spent the first part of that week
stumbling along behind my stubborn mule.
We were ploughing up a whole new section,
yes, that hillside that sits above the Sea of Galilee,
digging out and carting off old tree stumps,
roots and rocks and boulders,
preparing the virgin soil
to receive the precious seed.
I observed recently that the PUP Report had not changed anything. A pastor asked, "If nothing's changed, what's the big deal?" An elder responded that we are in a spiritual battle. These comments spurred my deeper evaluation of the dynamics gripping us all.
The key to understand our dilemma is to realize the depths of that spiritual war.
Some history is helpful. In 1978 the northern Presbyterian Church issued a Definitive Guidance prohibiting ordination of "... avowed, practicing homosexuals..."
In 1979 the Definitive Guidance of the southern Presbyterians stated, "...unrepentant homosexual practice does not accord with the requirements for ordination..."
With reunion, these statements were incorporated as Authoritative Interpretation (AI).
Why is it that so many well-intentioned, ethically-minded people behave so badly, so often? Nowhere is that more the case than during national election campaigns. The best and brightest work countless hours, empty their savings accounts, and promise to enact ennobling legislation, all aiming to fulfill their high call to civic service. But in the process they trash their opponents by slinging false accusations like competitors in a cow-pie-tossing competition.
"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Lord Acton has a point, but I disagree with him. I say, "Power does not necessarily corrupt, but the temptation to be corrupted by power is exceptionally strong."
Only God has absolute power, but we humans are responsible for our use of the relative power we can exercise. "I am not ashamed of the Gospel for it is the power of God ... unto salvation for all who believe!" (Romans 1:16)
I want both to invite you to think about power with me and to encourage you to pour your own unique content into the fascinating, vital subject.
I believe the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) is in a particularly parlous place.
For the last three decades we have been struggling with issues related to human sexuality. The most prominent issues have been abortion, the nature of marriage, and the ordination of non-celibate gays and lesbians.
A couple of months ago, a recently ordained minister was being examined during our presbytery meeting. Another pastor rose to challenge a portion of his statement of faith. The new minister looked down at what he had written, indicated his words did not express at all what he intended, and quickly owned up to his mistake. With grace and good humor, he recognized the error. With grace and a bit of levity, the presbytery noted his oversight - and then approved his examination. These days, such an exchange--a timely admission and a gracious response--is not always common among Presbyterians.
It started over a cup of coffee.
In the summer of 2004 two friends from seminary, both serving at the time as associate pastors in prominent downtown congregations, met for coffee in Richmond during General Assembly. (See these friends' thoughts in "Montreat meeting focuses Columbia grads on future" in the May 30, 2005, Outlook). After catching up, the conversation turned to the events of the Assembly. Both were incredibly frustrated with the politically-charged atmosphere, as well as the enormous amounts of time spent huddling and strategizing instead of praying and working together to make our church a healthier, more faithful place.
© Copyright 2026 The Presbyterian Outlook. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Statement. Website by Web Publisher PRO
