California courts uphold PC(USA) Constitution on church property issues
August 16, 2006
Media Inquiries: contact Mary Pace
GAC Office of Communication
(502) 569-5490
Mark Tammen
Constitutional Services
Office of the General Assembly
(502) 569-5433
George S. Burns
Legal Counsel for Presbytery of Hanmi, Synod
of Southern California & Hawaii, and
Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)
(949) 263-6777
California courts uphold PC(USA) Constitution on church property issues
Three cases tried or settled, fourth expected soon
LOUISVILLE, Ky. -- The Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, has recently issued a series of decisions that consistently hold that the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) prevents factions of local congregations from seizing church assets and harassing the faction of the congregation which remains loyal to PC(USA).
Recently, the Synod of Southern California and Hawaii, Hanmi Presbytery and the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) have been named as parties to lawsuits in the Los Angeles Superior Court involving particular churches that were in schism. Another was filed against the Presbytery of the Pacific, also within the synod. Those lawsuits involved Korean Hope Christian Church, Serone Church, Torrance First Presbyterian Church and Bethany United Presbyterian Church.
In each of those cases, congregations split into factions over selection and other issues concerning their pastor. After one side appealed to the presbytery or synod, the other faction unilaterally declared that the particular church had quit the denomination, and asserted control and ownership of all church property and funds, to the exclusion of both the other faction and the presbytery.
In all these cases, the courts have ruled that the dissident faction must follow the directions of the presbytery as to control or ownership of the church property.
"The courts applied the rules from our Book of Order which is part of the PC(USA) Constitution. The Presbyterian Church (USA) has clear processes based on its theology, said Mark Tammen, director of Constitutional Services, Office of the General Assembly, PC(USA).
"As such, the Constitution entrusts presbyteries with determining their 'strategy for mission' in their bounds. This is the 'yardstick' for making such decisions. Obviously secular judges would have difficulty in making such a theologically based determination, and in fact, are prohibited from doing so by well established U.S. Supreme Court precedent," Tammen added.
